Skip to main content
Technologies

Surveyor: Tablet Application for Archaeological Survey

Surveyor Tablet

ID: 2015-065 Surveyor: Tablet Application for Archaeological Survey

Reach out to us directly to learn more about this technology - Phone: (801) 422-6266

Invention Market Information
Commercialization and Marketing Report
Entrepreneur Plan

I. Executive Summary

Surveyor is a software application designed for tablets and handheld devices that streamlines archaeological data collection and reporting. It addresses the inefficiencies of traditional paper-based recording methods by enabling direct digital data entry and automating the generation of compliance reports required by federal and state agencies. The software is primarily intended for use by archaeologists in public agencies and private sector firms in regions with high levels of CRM activity, such as Utah, Nevada, and Idaho. The optimal path to commercialization is a hybrid approach that combines a direct startup launch using a SaaS model with a secondary licensing strategy. This allows for both control over product development and scalability through strategic partnerships.

II. Technology Overview

Surveyor is a software application that facilitates the recording of archaeological survey data on tablets and handheld devices. Its key features include:

  • Direct Digital Data Entry: Eliminates paper-based recording by enabling real-time data entry in the field.
  • Automated Report Generation: Automatically populates compliance reports and produces electronic deliverables for state and federal agencies.
  • GIS Integration: Integrates GIS mapping tools for visualizing archaeological site data.
  • Offline Functionality: Allows for data collection in remote areas without internet access, with automatic syncing upon reconnection.
  • Compliance Tools: Includes templates and features that align with federal and state CRM requirements, such as Section 106, NAGPRA, and ARPA.

The core innovation of Surveyor lies in its combination of mobility, automation, and compliance. It is designed to address critical pain points, such as manual transcription and fragmented workflows, transforming how archaeological data is collected, managed, and reported.

III. Market Analysis

  • Target Market: The primary target market includes Cultural Resource Management (CRM) firms, government agencies (BLM, NPS, SHPO), and academic institutions. The initial focus should be on regions with high CRM activity and stringent heritage regulations.
  • Total Addressable Market (TAM): The global archaeological services market is estimated to be between $1.5 to $2 billion annually, with a projected growth rate of 5-7% driven by increasing infrastructure projects, environmental assessments, and heritage preservation initiatives.
  • Serviceable Available Market (SAM): The U.S. market is estimated to be $1 Billion to $1.5 billion, with an initial regional focus for Surveyor estimated to be $200-300 million.
  • Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM): A realistic initial market capture for Surveyor is projected to be $10-20 million in annual recurring revenue.
  • Market Growth: The archaeological and CRM market is expected to grow steadily over the next 5-10 years, driven by regulatory requirements, infrastructure development, environmental concerns, and a focus on heritage preservation.
  • Competitive Landscape: While the market is niche, competitors include ESRI (ArcGIS), Codifi, DigTech, and Wildnote. Surveyor’s competitive advantage lies in its specific focus on archaeological compliance, automated reporting, mobile-first design, and cost-effectiveness. Surveyor is designed to be more accessible and affordable for smaller firms than premium GIS tools like ArcGIS.

IV. Commercialization Strategy

  • Recommended Path: A hybrid approach that combines a direct startup launch (SaaS model) with a secondary licensing option is recommended. This involves launching Surveyor as an independent SaaS product targeting small to mid-sized CRM firms, academic researchers, and state agencies.
  • Phased Rollout:
    • Phase 1 (Months 1-6): Pilot program and market validation, focusing on targeted outreach to CRM firms, universities, and SHPOs. This phase will include the development of a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) with core features like GIS integration, artifact cataloging, and compliance templates for Section 106 and NAGPRA.
    • Phase 2 (Months 6-12): Full launch and mobile expansion, incorporating mobile app development and expanding the target to government procurement channels (GSA, BLM, NPS).
    • Phase 3 (Months 12-18): National and international expansion, focusing on larger CRM contracts, GIS licensing and API sales.
  • Business Model: A SaaS subscription model with tiered pricing is recommended. This could be complemented by licensing options for enterprise clients and government agencies.
    • SaaS subscription plans for different sized firms.
    • Per-project licenses for smaller firms or individual archaeologists.
    • Enterprise licensing for large government agencies and major CRM firms.
    • API licensing to integrate with GIS platforms.
    • Compliance template updates can be sold as an add-on for recurring revenue.
    • Training and certification programs can provide additional revenue.
  • Pricing Strategy:
    • Subscription Model: Tiered pricing model based on the size of the firm or project, as well as included features.
    • Project-Based Licensing: Single-use licenses for smaller firms or individual archaeologists, ranging from $250 to $500 per project.
      • Enterprise/Government Licensing: Bulk licensing agreements for government agencies and large enterprises that manage multiple archaeological surveys.
    • Add-ons: Offering additional features such as template customization, premium support, or long-term data archiving.
  • API Access: Offer API access for integration with GIS platforms.
  • Training and Certification: Users can pay for training and gain access to exclusive features.
  • Revenue Projections:
    • Year 1: $150,000 - $300,000 from pilot programs and early adopters.
    • Year 2: $450,000 - $600,000 through expansion to mobile, government contracting, and a broader customer base.
    • Year 3: $750,000 - $1,000,000+ through recurring subscriptions, licensing agreements, and API sales.
    • Long-term (5 years): Potential to exceed $2 million annually through national and international expansion.
  • Cost Structure:
    • Initial development costs range between $355,000 and $590,000.
    • Scaling costs, including product development, marketing, staffing, and compliance, are estimated at $320,000 in year 1, $419,500 in year 2, and $453,000 in year 3.
  • Break-Even Analysis: Break-even is projected within 15-24 months of launch with secured contracts and government deals.
  • Funding Sources: SBIR/STTR grants, National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) grants, and partnerships with CRM firms.
  • Pilot Programs: Engaging in pilot programs with universities, CRM firms, and SHPOs will generate early revenue and feedback.
  • Intellectual Property: File for patents on core automation and reporting features, as well as copyrights on software code and design. Pursue trademarks to protect the brand identity.

V. Marketing Strategy

  • Core Marketing Strategies:
    • Content Marketing: Create blog posts, white papers, and video content to establish Surveyor as a leader in archaeological compliance automation.
    • Industry Conferences: Attend and present at key industry events, such as the Society for American Archaeology (SAA) and the National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP).
    • LinkedIn and Targeted Social Media Advertising: Run targeted LinkedIn ads and InMail campaigns to reach CRM project managers and SHPO contacts.
    • Referral and Affiliate Programs: Partner with archaeological consultants and independent CRM specialists to recommend Surveyor.
    • Webinars and Live Demonstrations: Host monthly webinars to showcase Surveyor’s features and compliance automation tools.
    • Direct Outreach to SHPOs and THPOs: Develop targeted email campaigns to promote the tool for digitizing and standardizing reporting.
    • Government Procurement: Register Surveyor on GSA Advantage, FedBizOpps, and SAM.gov to qualify for federal procurement projects.
  • Academic Partnerships: Collaborate with universities and field schools to embed Surveyor into curricula, driving early adoption.
  • Multi-Channel Strategy: Combine direct sales, partnerships, digital marketing, and distributor networks.
  • Sales Channels:
    • Direct Sales: Target mid-to-large CRM firms, government agencies, and academic institutions.
    • Online Subscriptions: Utilize an SEO-optimized website with demo videos and pricing tiers to attract smaller CRM firms and researchers.
    • Government Portals: Sell directly to government agencies through procurement platforms (GSA, BLM, NPS).
    • Academic Partnerships: Offer certifications, training, and continuing education credits through professional archaeological associations and academic institutions.
    • Distributors/VARs: Engage value-added resellers to expand reach.
    • API and Platform Licensing: License Surveyor as a plugin to CRM and GIS platforms.
  • Marketing Budget (Year 1):
    • Content Marketing and SEO: 20%
    • Conferences and Trade Shows: 25%
    • LinkedIn and Digital Ads: 15%
    • Webinars and Demonstrations: 10%
    • Partnerships and Academic Collaboration: 15%
    • Direct Outreach (SHPOs, Government): 10%
    • Affiliate and Referral Programs: 5%
  • Brand Messaging:
    • Emphasize Surveyor’s unique value proposition: efficiency, compliance, and cost-effectiveness.
    • Highlight the benefits of automated reporting, mobile-first design, and ease of use.
    • Position Surveyor as a solution that addresses the specific needs of archaeologists and CRM professionals.

VI. Competitive Advantages

Surveyor’s competitive advantages include: * Specialization: Tailored for archaeological compliance, reducing the need for customization. * Automation: Automated report generation, reducing administrative burden by up to 50%. * Mobile-First Design: Optimized for tablets and smartphones used in the field. * Cost-Effectiveness: Designed to be affordable for smaller CRM firms, with streamlined licensing. * Ease of Use: User-friendly interface compared to complex GIS platforms. * Offline Capabilities: Fully functional offline, syncing upon internet access. * Compliance Focus: Specifically designed for state and federal compliance with automated deliverables. * Centralized Data: All in one platform to manage field data, reporting and GIS mapping.

VII. Risk Assessment and Mitigation

  • Slow Market Adoption: CRM firms may resist transitioning from manual processes.
    • Mitigation: Implement pilot programs with CRM firms and SHPOs, and collaborate with universities.
  • Competition: Existing companies like ESRI, Codifi, and DigTech have a strong presence.
    • Mitigation: Focus on niche compliance automation, build partnerships with SHPOs, and highlight unique features like artifact recognition AI.
  • Legal and Compliance Risks: Non-compliance with data protection laws or accessibility standards.
    • Mitigation: Engage legal and compliance consultants during development, and pursue certifications.
  • Cash Flow Constraints: Delayed revenue in Year 1.
    • Mitigation: Focus on core features for initial sales, implement phased development, and seek funding through grants and investors.
  • Freedom to Operate Concerns: The potential for patent or intellectual property risks from competitors.
    • Mitigation: Conduct a patent search to determine the best strategy for automation workflows, seek provisional patents, and engage with an IP attorney.

VIII. Development and Scaling

  • Phased Development:
    • MVP Development (6-9 months): Build core features like offline data entry, GIS mapping, and basic automated reporting.
    • Advanced Feature Development (6-12 months): Incorporate AI for artifact recognition, enhanced GIS, and multi-user collaboration tools.
    • Field Testing and Iteration (3-4 months): Conduct pilot programs with CRM firms and agencies.
    • Scalability and Security (3-6 months): Implement data encryption, cloud storage, and role-based access.
  • Technical Challenges:
    • Offline functionality and data syncing.
    • Automated compliance report generation that meets regulatory standards.
    • Mobile usability in various field conditions.
    • Accurate GIS integration.
  • Partnerships: Collaborate with GIS and CRM companies for technology development and market access.
  • Resource Requirements:
    • Development Team: 2-3 Software Engineers, 1-2 UI/UX Designers, Compliance Specialist.
    • Advisors and Partners: Archaeologists, CRM consultants, GIS specialists.
    • Funding Needs: $450,000 - $750,000 for full MVP development, pilot testing, and launch.
    • Cloud Infrastructure: Scalable services for storage and syncing (AWS, Google Cloud).

IX. Financial Projections

  • Total Development Cost: $450,000 - $750,000 (minimum to maximum estimates).
  • Total Three-Year Revenue: $1,050,000 to $1,900,000, depending on the scaling strategy.
  • ROI (3 Years): 133%-253%.
  • Break-Even Point: 15-24 months.
  • Projected Revenue (Year 1): $150,000 - $300,000.
  • Projected Revenue (Year 2): $450,000 - $600,000.
  • Projected Revenue (Year 3): $750,000 - $1,000,000+.
  • Profitability: Achieved by Year 2 through recurring subscriptions, government contracts, and licensing deals.
  • Funding Opportunities: Federal grants, SBIR/STTR programs, private investors, and partnerships with CRM firms.

X. Conclusion

Surveyor presents a valuable and innovative solution for the archaeological surveying and CRM sector. By addressing key inefficiencies in the field through digital data collection and automated reporting, Surveyor is well-positioned to disrupt the market and generate substantial revenue. The recommended commercialization strategy, including a phased rollout, SaaS subscription model, and targeted marketing efforts, will facilitate successful market entry and long-term growth. By prioritizing core development, strategic partnerships, and intellectual property protection, Surveyor can establish a strong competitive advantage in the market.

 

Phase 1: Market Validation and Pilot Programs (Months 1-6)

  • Targeted Outreach: Focus on mid-sized CRM firms in high-regulation states (e.g., California, Texas, Arizona) and engage 3-5 of them for pilot programs. Offer discounted pilot licenses ($5,000 - $10,000 per firm) in exchange for case studies and testimonials. Also, engage 3-4 university archaeology departments and Tribal Historic Preservation Offices (THPOs) to promote Surveyor for NAGPRA compliance.
  • Refine the Existing Prototype: While the prototype is functional, collect user feedback from pilot programs to refine the software's interface, core functionalities, and reporting templates. Ensure the core web-based platform includes GIS integration, automated artifact cataloging, and Section 106 and NAGPRA compliance templates.
  • Focus on Regulatory Alignment: Develop customizable reporting templates for each state, and work with SHPOs through pilot surveys and regulatory testing. Collaborate with archaeologists, CRM firms, and SHPO offices to identify specific compliance requirements for different states.
  • Intellectual Property Protection: File provisional patents for the unique aspects of the automated reporting process, data structuring, and GIS integration if not already done. Trademark the Surveyor name and any distinctive logos. Ensure the software code, field templates, and automated report formats are copyrighted. Maintain certain data structures and back-end algorithms as trade secrets.
  • Establish a Basic Online Presence: Create a website with product information, case studies, and licensing details. Use targeted LinkedIn campaigns to reach CRM project managers and potential partners.

Phase 2: Feature Expansion and Market Penetration (Months 6-12)

  • Develop a Mobile App: Build an offline-capable iOS/Android mobile app focusing on field data logging, photo capture, artifact geotagging, and offline sync features. Prioritize a clean, field-friendly interface with large, easy-to-click buttons.
  • Pursue Government Contracts: Apply for GSA Schedule approval to enable direct sales to federal agencies and begin FedRAMP certification to meet federal data security standards. Target contracts with BLM, NPS, and U.S. Forest Service.
  • Expand into International Markets: Target Canada, UK, and Australia, where CRM regulations mirror U.S. frameworks.
  • Implement a Tiered Subscription Model: Develop basic, professional, and enterprise tiers that allow users to scale their subscriptions. Offer per-project licensing as an option for smaller firms. Consider add-ons such as extra storage, offline mode, and AI.
  • Develop a Customer Service and Training Program: Provide user training programs, tutorials, and customer service to ensure smooth adoption. Offer both online and in-person training and certification programs.
  • Strategic Partnerships: Explore partnerships with GIS providers (e.g., ESRI, Trimble) to offer Surveyor as a plugin, and with archaeology/CRM software providers such as Codifi and DigTech.
  • Content Marketing: Focus on content marketing to highlight Surveyor's ability to automate compliance and streamline fieldwork. Publish blog posts, white papers, and case studies showcasing successful projects.

Phase 3: Scaling and Growth (Months 12-24)

  • Scale Sales and Marketing Efforts: Target small to mid-sized CRM firms, public agencies, and academic archaeologists needing affordable, mobile-friendly tools. Focus on the niche market in archaeological compliance, emphasizing ease of use and affordability compared to larger platforms. Establish an in-house sales team for enterprise accounts, licensing, and government contracts. Also develop a digital marketing strategy with SEO optimization, LinkedIn campaigns, Google Ads, and email newsletters.
  • Secure Recurring Revenue Streams: Convert pilot clients to annual subscribers. Upsell add-on features such as GIS enhancements, AI automation, and artifact recognition tools. Expand API licensing to GIS platforms and offer custom development and white-label options.
  • Refine Compliance Capabilities: Ensure that Surveyor’s automated reporting meets legal and regulatory standards. Develop a modular compliance engine that can load jurisdiction-specific templates dynamically, and implement an update mechanism to ensure templates reflect current laws and regulations.
  • Continue IP Protection: File utility patents for unique automated reporting processes and refine patent claims based on user feedback and market needs.
  • Consider International Expansion: Target UNESCO projects, European CRM firms, and Middle Eastern archaeological sites, adapting the platform for environmental and forestry surveys. Explore partnerships with heritage organizations such as ICOMOS and UNESCO.

Ongoing Considerations:

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Conduct patent searches and work with an IP attorney to ensure the technology operates within safe boundaries.
  • Technical Challenges: Address challenges related to offline syncing, GIS integration, automated compliance reporting, and data accuracy. Implement data encryption, secure logins, and multi-factor authentication to ensure the security and privacy of archaeological site data.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Adhere to NAGPRA, ARPA, and data privacy regulations (GDPR, FISMA). Partner with SHPOs and regulatory agencies to align with state-specific requirements.
  • User Experience: Ensure Surveyor has an intuitive, mobile-first interface with minimal training needs. Focus on usability to overcome adoption barriers.
  • Continuous Improvement: Engage with CRM professionals, academics, and regulatory bodies to gather ongoing feedback.
  • Competitive Advantage: Continuously update Surveyor with exclusive features like artifact AI and mobile survey tools, staying ahead of competitors.